On 14.12.2007, at 01:31, Philippe Roussel wrote:
I thought about using it when I started this project but, to be honest, I'm lazy :o)
:-) Well, you probably looked at sope-ical, which is (slightly) different to NGCards. (Wolfgang started a completely new library based on the old one, for reasons I still don't really understand ;-)
libical is really simple to use, as far as I can see works and seems to be more or less maintained (I've been contacted to test SimpleAgenda with the future libical 0.30). On your opinion, what's wrong with libical ?
Uhm, I found it really hard to use and completely unmaintained. But apparently you are fine with it :-)
On the other end, NGCards is a big library, apparently not very well documented (sorry :-) and seems to depend on many other stuff (versit SAX driver, SAX, sope-xml etc) but I may be wrong...
Hm, no. It just depends on sope-xml/SaxObjC (a rather small lib with no additional dependencies). Everything else is included in NGCards, and its not *that* big.
If I can use NGCards without adding to many dependencies and with some benefits over libical, I would glad to do it.
I guess the biggest benefit is that it is high level and directly integrates at the Foundation library. And its actively maintained :-)
In fact I wonder how you deal with things like date handling and recurrences. Hm, should have a look at the source ;-)
Greets, Helge -- Helge Hess http://www.helgehess.eu/ _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
