Am 20.11.2010 15:46, schrieb Riccardo Mottola: > Furthermore, in some of the links Gregory posted, they describe our > adherence to OpenStep and our following of cocoa in this manner: > > * They add methods and classes, either from Cocoa or their own > extensions, if they add substantial value and don't interfere with > OpenStep and/or Cocoa compatibility. > * They generally don't remove things unless there is a clearly > better implementation in newer Cocoa API > * Where there is a real problem with a change, they will attempt > find a technically superior work-around. In rare cases, this might > involve a change in the original OpenStep API > > > I personally like this description! It also shows some blue in the sky, > given the current bashing and destructive thread we are having here lately.
Great that you like these statements. They are actually taken from our GNUstep mission statement :-) http://www.gnustep.org/information/mission.html But I have to admit that this is really deeply hidden in our web site and it took me some time to find, even though I know what I was looking for. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
