Hi, Fred Kiefer wrote: > Am 20.11.2010 15:46, schrieb Riccardo Mottola: > >> Furthermore, in some of the links Gregory posted, they describe our >> adherence to OpenStep and our following of cocoa in this manner: >> >> * They add methods and classes, either from Cocoa or their own >> extensions, if they add substantial value and don't interfere with >> OpenStep and/or Cocoa compatibility. >> * They generally don't remove things unless there is a clearly >> better implementation in newer Cocoa API >> * Where there is a real problem with a change, they will attempt >> find a technically superior work-around. In rare cases, this might >> involve a change in the original OpenStep API >> >> >> I personally like this description! It also shows some blue in the sky, >> given the current bashing and destructive thread we are having here lately. >> > > Great that you like these statements. They are actually taken from our > GNUstep mission statement :-) > http://www.gnustep.org/information/mission.html > > But I have to admit that this is really deeply hidden in our web site > and it took me some time to find, even though I know what I was looking > for. > > I just was pointed to this one here, might be of interest: http://blog.deliciousrobots.com/2010/11/27/sonys-changes-to-gnustep-gui-library-adding-touch/
cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
