Fine by me. -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 6 May 2011 14:15:46 -0600 > Von: Adam Fedor <[email protected]> > An: Discuss GNUstep <[email protected]> > CC: Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow
> > On May 6, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Eric Wasylishen wrote: > > > On 2011-05-06, at 1:38 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: > > > >> Great! Now what should we do about this? Release a bug fix for back? > That way we would have a different version number for back and the > corresponding gui. But will this cause any harm? > >> > >> With all the great changes from Eric in gui we should only do a new > full release after completing that change cycle. I would expect that this take > up at least two more months. An intermediate bug fix release sounds > appropriate. > >> > >> Fred > > > > I think doing a bug fix release makes sense. It would be r32849 (Version > 0.20.0) with r32986 and r32987 applied (I made a first attempt at fixing > the bug in r32986 which I didn't like and undid in r32987). > > > > I don't see a problem with having gui at 0.20.0 and back at 0.20.1. > > > > I've branched the back 0.20.0 release and I can make bug fix release > anytime if you'd like. Just let me know. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
