On 14 Feb 2012, at 13:46, Gregory Casamento wrote: > Keeping SVN is a mistake given what has been demonstrated by GNA's > failure. SVN gives us a single point of failure. A DVCS would > eliminate that problem.
I'm not sure I fully agree with this. The single point of failure exists in any system where w have an authoritative repository. We could have an official git-svn mirror somewhere, or even a svn mirror using svncync that became the authoritative one when GNA was down if the only issue is being able to get at the code when gna is down. David -- Sent from my Cray X1 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
