On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Thomas Davie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 14 Feb 2012, at 13:48, David Chisnall wrote: > > > On 14 Feb 2012, at 13:46, Gregory Casamento wrote: > > > >> Keeping SVN is a mistake given what has been demonstrated by GNA's > >> failure. SVN gives us a single point of failure. A DVCS would > >> eliminate that problem. > > > > I'm not sure I fully agree with this. The single point of failure exists > > in any system where w have an authoritative repository. We could have an > > official git-svn mirror somewhere, or even a svn mirror using svncync that > > became the authoritative one when GNA was down if the only issue is being > > able to get at the code when gna is down. > > Just to throw an extra spanner in the discussion – darcs (the original DVCS) > [...]
Has anyone played with veracity[1]? Being the latest entry in the world of DVCS, it seems to take the best ideas from the existing systems. Fossil is awesome too! [1] http://veracity-scm.com -- Programming is difficult business. It should never be undertaken in ignorance. --Douglas Crockford, "Javascript: The Good Parts" _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
