On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 19:14, Philippe Roussel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > FWIW, I fully agree with Sebastian here, moving useful code to GAP (when > there's no active maintainer of course) would be nice. > > GAP switching from cvs to something saner would be cool, at least for me. > > Having some kind of governance on what app should be polished, what > should be worked on etc could be beneficial (for example, 1 great pdf > viewer would probably be better than 5 not really good ones), even if > all the work is done on everybody's free time. > > Would it make sense to switch to DVCS for individual GAP projects, and keep one reference project pointing to the others? -- Ivan Vučica - [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
