Le 13/04/2012 20:15, Ivan Vučica a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 19:14, Philippe Roussel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> FWIW, I fully agree with Sebastian here, moving useful code to GAP (when >> there's no active maintainer of course) would be nice. >> >> GAP switching from cvs to something saner would be cool, at least for me. >> >> Having some kind of governance on what app should be polished, what >> should be worked on etc could be beneficial (for example, 1 great pdf >> viewer would probably be better than 5 not really good ones), even if >> all the work is done on everybody's free time. >> >> > Would it make sense to switch to DVCS for individual GAP projects, and keep > one reference project pointing to the others?
Well, GAP projects are small enough to be in a single tree but I would vote for any setup not using cvs, even if I have to learn a new tool. Another potentialy beneficial move would to be use text files for the UIs. I find it annoying to not be able to diff 2 versions of a gorm interface but maybe that's just me :o) Philippe _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
