Am Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:45:43 -0400 schrieb Gregory Casamento <[email protected]> :
> Your statement here: > > It gives you all the freedoms, the GPL (tm) is meant for: > - the freedom to use the software for any purpose, > - the freedom to change the software to suit your needs, > - the freedom to share the software with your friends and neighbors, and > - the freedom to share the changes you make. > > Is not correct. It is contradicted by the term here: > > For commercial organisations usage is free for the first 5 concurrent named > users. > Continued usage by exceeding concurrent named users needs to be licensed in > a seperate, written > license agreement with IntarS Unternehmenssoftware GmbH. > This applies also to the IntarS contained in a derived work. > Commercial organisations must immediately send a mail to [email protected] to > buy required licenses. > > This is mainly because you are discriminating between different types of > users. The license does not grant the same freedoms as the GPL sure, that's right; but how can I express, that in real life usage it doesn't make a difference compared to LGPL for 99% of the users? what if I put it this way: ... It gives you practically all the freedoms, the GPL (tm) is meant for: - the freedom to use the software for nearly any purpose, ... -- Pirmin Braun - IntarS Unternehmenssoftware GmbH - Am Hofbräuhaus 1 - 96450 Coburg +49 2642 40526292 +49 174 9747584 - skype:pirminb www.intars.de [email protected] Geschäftsführer: Pirmin Braun, Ralf Engelhardt Registergericht: Amtsgericht Coburg HRB3136 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
