On 18 September 2013 10:31, Pirmin Braun <p...@intars.de> wrote: > If there is one around, that suites our case, I'd be glad to use it.
Look harder. Look at dual licensing. I'm sorry, I know this is not what you want to hear, but seriously, I think you are making a serious mistake. > the planned implementation would display a message on every user login > explaining very clear where they are and produce a daily summary of how many > peak concurrent named users were active and what that means. Let me translate that: "You don't know advance if you have violated the licence. But we will tell you the moment you do!" _No_ sane company would go for that. > but how would you call a group of 100 women where 1 of them is pregnant? Irrelevant. > The world is full of things like "free entrance for children younger than 5 > years" > but (in case it's your business model) you wouldn't write a sign "free > entrance for persons younger than 100 years" > instead you would put it "free entrance for everybody (except you're 99 or > older)" Still irrelevant. I am sorry, but it is. You are shooting yourself in the foot. There is no advantage to you in this route, and it will take extra effort. It is a bad plan. As the launch announcement for OSv said today: "These days, credibility == open source" Not open source? Not credible. You're not Free. This will mean lots of potential parties will not be interested, no matter how cool the product. -- Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
