On Thursday, January 30, 2014 17:08 CET, Markus Hitter <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 30.01.2014 15:08, schrieb Sebastian Reitenbach: > > OpenBSD packages are using something very similar to the FHS layout > > and it works great. > > To all I can see, what GNUstep calls a "FHS layout" is just stuffing > frameworks into /usr/lib instead of /Library and similar. Bundle-type > layout is kept, just placed slightly elsewhere. >
Name it as you like, I call it like a "compromise", which works well for me and OpenBSD packages. And besides the bundles and Frameworks, its nearly FHS. I don't know if you have found the fs layout file already, but its part of the make port, the file can be found here [1]. Since FHS doesn't has a meaning on OpenBSD at all, I also have no real reason even trying to adhe to it ;) For me, man 7 hier [2] is more important. Maybe its worth for you to take a look at the altlinux GNUstep RPMs that you can find here [3]. I cannot really figure out what filesystem layout they are using there, therefore CC'ing the maintainer, or at least one of them. [1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/x11/gnustep/make/files/openbsd?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain [2] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=hier&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html [3] http://packages.altlinux.org/en/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&branch=Sisyphus&query=gnustep For the case the FHS layout is too much of a pain, does Debian/Ubuntu allows similar compromises like I did for OpenBSD? cheers, Sebastian > > Markus > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.reprap-diy.com/ > http://www.jump-ing.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
