> In my observation, there are two sides in this discussion: > > a) we do coding only for our own benefit. If others find this beneficial, we > are happy, but we do nothing for them, especially if they demand. They can do > themselves, because we need more manpower.
This is not the GNUstep side. So please be clear that this is not a viewpoint shared with the GNUstep project (I hjope it's not yours). IMO this is primarily a view promulgated by trolls as a 'straw man' argument (ie claim GNUstep is something it's not, then attack it for being that imaginary thing). > b) we should learn about what others outside of our little world think and > need and do at least a little for them. This will attract these "others" to > really use what we do. And if we are lucky, there will be good coders amongst > them who start to contribute and we get more manpower. This *is* what GNUstep has been doing for decades now. Arguably it's not working, but I still think it's basically the right approach. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
