I humbly apologize. Would it be better if I rephrase as: > And imagine that for a popular Linux distribution there is a packaged > version for GNUstep (base, make, gui & back) made with
*mulle-objc compiler and> mulle obj-c runtime *> And then again, imagine I packaged my application for this distribution, but > with the *clang compiler/etoilé runtime;* because if they do not cooperate, you're cutting in half instead of making great, as far as I'm concerned. > 2016-12-02 15:47 GMT+01:00 Liam Proven <lpro...@gmail.com>: > On 2 December 2016 at 15:04, Edwin Ancaer <eanc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't have experience with this kind of varied environments, so this > might > > be a stupid question... > > > > let's imagine I created this wonderful application with GNUstep. > > And imagine that for a popular Linux distribution there is a packaged > > version for GNUstep (base, make, gui & back) made with compiler A and > > runtime A. > > And then again, imagine I packaged my application for this distibution, > but > > with Compiler B/Runtime B ; > > > > If someone used the package manager to install GNUstep and my > application, > > would this be guaranteed to be working? > > > You really should not hijack someone else's thread. > > Start a new one with its own subject line. > > -- > Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven > Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com > Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven > UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053 > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
