Officially it is one limited subnet. practically exceptions do get made...

On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:

> just to clarify: OpenSRS says "subnet" but actually *they* mean "a list"
> as you can register 1.2.3.4 and 5.6.7.8 with your account at the same time.
> 
> regards,
> doytchin
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christopher Masto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 7:26 PM
> Subject: My problem [was Re: Fw: a subnet of no more than 64 hosts ?]
> 
> 
> > On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:03:08PM -0400, Charles Daminato wrote:
> > > On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Chuck@WiseElvs wrote:
> > > > Can anyone tell me what Christopher Masto's problem is? Is he a retard
> ...
> > > > or does he just insult people who try to answer his questions.
> >
> > Since you asked, I'll tell you what my problem is.
> >
> > My problem is that I am getting fed up with the number of utterly
> > stupid questions being asked by utterly stupid people who have no
> > business being in the Internet business.
> >
> > My problem is that someone who never heard the word "subnet" before
> > intends to start taking people's money to touch the DNS.  This does
> > not bode well for an industry that is already painfully short on clue.
> >
> > My problem is that I ANSWERED the question; I did not ASK the
> > question.  Yet "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" apparently lacks the reading
> > comprehension skills to have figured that out, and decided to "help"
> > me out by answering a question I didn't ask.  Furthermore, he answered
> > it in private mail to me, quoting the original question as well as my
> > answer AND my signature, and to top it off he quoted it in that
> > irritating and incorrect "Jeopardy" style.  Then he topped off the
> > topping by giving a WRONG ANSWER.  (Hint: a list of IP addresses is
> > not a subnet.)  This is not the way to get on my good side.
> >
> > My problem is that I have been watching "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" post to
> > this mailing list for some time, and virtually everything he says is
> > useless, inappropriate, and/or wrong.  Posting private mail to a
> > public mailing list is just another example of his ignorance.
> >
> > I apologize for this inappropriate posting.  I will not continue this
> > discussion any further, and will simply ignore this guy in the future.
> > I should know better than to respond at all, but occasionally even I
> > make an error in judgment.
> > --
> > Christopher Masto         Senior Network Monkey      NetMonger
> Communications
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.netmonger.net
> >
> > Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon --
> http://www.freebsd.org/
> >
> 


Thanks,

-rwr









Ross Wm. Rader                     
Director Product Management, 
Channel Platform Group
Tucows Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                    
t. 416.535.0123 x335                      
f. 416.531.5584

"Embrace the cow, love the cow.  
And remember, Winsock means love."

Reply via email to