this is the case because i asked opensrs a month ago and actually i have
3 absolutely different ips which work well. different people have different
reasons to do that; and i don't believe there is something related to the
security here?
:)
regards,
doytchin
----- Original Message -----
From: Derek J. Balling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Doytchin Spiridonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Christopher Masto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: My problem [was Re: Fw: a subnet of no more than 64 hosts ?]
> If that is the case, then the documentation should be amended to match
reality.
>
> If that is NOT supposed to be the case, then the people who are doing
> that should be ... corrected, to match the same security standards as
> the rest of us. :)
>
> D
> (who votes for a subnet, preferably one that is listed with ARIN)
>
>
>
> At 9:20 PM +0300 7/30/00, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> >just to clarify: OpenSRS says "subnet" but actually *they* mean "a list"
> >as you can register 1.2.3.4 and 5.6.7.8 with your account at the same
time.
> >
> >regards,
> >doytchin
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Christopher Masto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 7:26 PM
> >Subject: My problem [was Re: Fw: a subnet of no more than 64 hosts ?]
> >
> >
> >> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:03:08PM -0400, Charles Daminato wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Chuck@WiseElvs wrote:
> >> > > Can anyone tell me what Christopher Masto's problem is? Is he a
retard
> >...
> >> > > or does he just insult people who try to answer his questions.
> >>
> >> Since you asked, I'll tell you what my problem is.
> >>
> >> My problem is that I am getting fed up with the number of utterly
> >> stupid questions being asked by utterly stupid people who have no
> >> business being in the Internet business.
> >>
> >> My problem is that someone who never heard the word "subnet" before
> >> intends to start taking people's money to touch the DNS. This does
> >> not bode well for an industry that is already painfully short on clue.
> >>
> >> My problem is that I ANSWERED the question; I did not ASK the
> >> question. Yet "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" apparently lacks the reading
> >> comprehension skills to have figured that out, and decided to "help"
> >> me out by answering a question I didn't ask. Furthermore, he answered
> >> it in private mail to me, quoting the original question as well as my
> >> answer AND my signature, and to top it off he quoted it in that
> >> irritating and incorrect "Jeopardy" style. Then he topped off the
> >> topping by giving a WRONG ANSWER. (Hint: a list of IP addresses is
> >> not a subnet.) This is not the way to get on my good side.
> >>
> >> My problem is that I have been watching "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" post to
> >> this mailing list for some time, and virtually everything he says is
> >> useless, inappropriate, and/or wrong. Posting private mail to a
> >> public mailing list is just another example of his ignorance.
> >>
> >> I apologize for this inappropriate posting. I will not continue this
> >> discussion any further, and will simply ignore this guy in the future.
> >> I should know better than to respond at all, but occasionally even I
> >> make an error in judgment.
> >> --
> >> Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger
> >Communications
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://www.netmonger.net
> > >
> > > Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon --
> >http://www.freebsd.org/
> > >
>
