Everyone out there who's ever had to deal with Netsol's gross incompetence
would probably get a kick out of the details found in Michael Johnson's
legal filings:

http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=169

Other interesting bits found in Johnson's filing that ICANNWatch doesn't
excerpt include details of how Netsol/Verisign illegally shut off the
health coverage for Mr. Johnson's premature twins as they fired him, and
how they had security escort him out --

"After the Exit Conference Plaintiff learned that Defendants had arranged
for the Verisign Security Man to escort him out of the building in full
view of all Verisign employees, an event that was never done to any
Director or executive employee in the Herndon office, and such was
intended to be humiliating, embarrassing, and belittling in stature and
personal reputation and basic dignity. The Verisign Security Man was so
embarrassed for Plaintiff that he insisted in carrying his valise to his
car and shook his hand and apologized, stating that no other white
officer or executive was ever so escorted from this building." (page 32)

The relief Johnson seeks for the whole debacle is somewhere in the
$100-200 million range .. !

Why hasn't mainstream press picked up on this yet?

Abe


On Thu, 24 May 2001, William X. Walsh wrote:

> Hello Charles,
>
> Thursday, May 24, 2001, 8:44:16 AM, Charles Daminato wrote:
>
> > Just for clarification, our entire system will be going down for this
> > outage.  We apologize for the inconvenience, and the short lead time (our
> > lead time was short as well).
>
> Yeah, Verisign is winning points for short lead times this week.
>
> They shut down the domain policy list without notice this morning,
> rather abruptly, and removed all the archives for it from their
> website.
>
> An ex-employee had posted details of his lawsuit and numerous other
> complaints about Verisign (such as violations of ICANN policy and
> their DoC agreements, etc) to the list, Verisign removed the post from
> the archives.  The same ex-employee posted another message this
> morning, and very shortly thereafter, domain-policy was no more.
>
> In my mind....it seems to lend some credence to his case.

Reply via email to