Sorry...that should read:
1) 10 to qualify
and ADDITIONALLY
2) 10-50 get credit, 50+ get a choice of credit or cheque.
Is it early?
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Support Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Charles Daminato wrote:
> I can't speak officially at this point but my personal opinion is:
>
> 1) You must qualify at least 10 registration transactions per month (new
> registrations or transfers) to gain the benefits of the promotion
>
> and alternatively...
>
> 2) If you transfer more than 50 names we'll send you a cheque (if you so
> desire) - if you transfer between 10 and 50 names you gain RCU credit to
> your account.
>
> As for namebargain.com - they ARE register.com from what I can tell - and
> quite the extensive contract they have (took me quite some time to read it
> all... several bits of it).
>
> I found it quite interesting that in the case of payment descrepancies
> (charge-backs, etc) the name automatically defaults to Register.com and
> you'll have to pay $200 to get it back. The language of the 'payment
> descrepancies' portion is quite extensive.
>
> Lawdy lawdy lawdy I lawve legaleez :)
>
>
> Charles Daminato
> OpenSRS Support Manager
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Kirk Fletcher wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I notice with the transfer rebates promotion, that it has the proviso,
> > "qualified by registering or transferring more than 10 domain names a
> > month". I don't have any objection to this, but noticed lower down
> > the page, it says specifically, "RSP's who transfer more than 50
> > domain names per month during the promotion can choose between account
> > credit or cheque; RSP's transferring between 10 and 50 names during the
> > promotion are eligible for account credit only".
> > [ Source: http://www.opensrs.org/batchtransferpromo.html ]
> >
> > My point is... that the first staetment doesn't seem to distinguish
> > between transfers and registrations... that is, as long as you use
> > 10 in the month, you get a rebate on the transfers.
> >
> > The second statement however, suggests that only transfers count
> > towards this quota. Could someone please clarify as to which is the
> > correct interpretation?
> >
> > Now onto the second issue :)
> >
> > Yet another site offering cheap domains - this one claiming to be
> > a division of register.com. Namebargain.com is selling domains
> > to the general public - with no bulk purchase necessary for $9.99
> > (US currency). Only one year registration available though.
> >
> > Just thought I'd mention it...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kirk.
> >
>
>