Re[2]: Policy input re: chargebacks

[William X. Walsh]

Hello ecs,

Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 7:52:30 PM, you wrote:

> Hooray!

> It's a good start.

Yes, it is.

> A little broader than what you are proposing, as it don't
> limit it to charge backs, but include any and all types of
> non-payment.

I agree with you that Ross's language doesn't limit it, but it would
be nice to have it spelled out.   I agree with your wording, and find
no fault with it.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]