Hello Scott,
If there is a big overhead involved (as what I can understand), will it be
worth locking domain names except in the case of disputes and big financial
mess.
For example a person frauds me for $10. And the locking expense be $5 or
whatsoever. So I am spending $15 on a domain which does not belong to me and
just to make sure that this guy does not register it from somewhere else.
I think it will be better to give the RSP the right for the domain name. But
how ? needs to be worked out.
Just a thought. I might be wrong.
Abhishek Rungta
Indus Net Technologies
Phone : 91-33-2201718 2210896
http://www.talash.net
! Outsource your web development to us !
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Lockdowns coming?
> This is definitely coming.
>
> I would like to take an informal poll...
>
> Now, I know that this may be hard to objectively comment on, but please
> try. :) We will look at this more formally before releasing it, but to
> satisfy my curiosity:
>
> This (locking a name) is something that most people in the industry charge
> for, generally quite a reasonable fee. There is an admin overhead in
> dealing with the unlocking of names as necessary (after they have been
> locked, some sort or paper/legal trust system would need to be in place to
> handle this). Since we would manage that part (likely), how would you feel
> we should charge for this? How much?
>
> Thanks -
>
> sA
>
> At 08:45 AM 8/16/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >I would like to assure all Resellers that we will never do anything
> >"similar to
> >NSI" :)
> >
> >We do have to power to lock down domains. Currently, we use it only for
> >ownership and payment disputes.
> >
> >We are working on a system to extend this as an option for all domains.
(Scott
> >Allen has talked about this, search the archives if you're interested.)
> >
> >hope this helps
> >
> >On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, ross wrote: > ie. maybe similar to NSI's locked
> >system where you can't make any changes > without a fax or some other
> >authorization? to ensure that even if someone > got the l/p they couldn't
do
> >any damage to your domains.... >
> > > ..ross
> > > 00x75,0x75,0x6e,0x65,0x74
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Charles Daminato wrote:
> > >
> > > > Currently our security model works like this:
> > > >
> > > > QuickStart - username/password under SSL
> > > >
> > > > FullAccess - IP ACL, username MATCHED to IP in ACL, Crypt key
> > > >
> > > > What sort of lockdown mechanism do you propose?
> > > >
> > > > Charles Daminato
> > > > OpenSRS Support Manager
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Swerve wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey opensrs gang,
> > > > >
> > > > > When will the previously talked about lockdown mechanism be
coming?
> > > > > (as in another layer of security, (on top of passwords) to prevent
> > hanky
> > > > > panky.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Swerve
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >--
> >Robert Rivers
> >OpenSRS Technical Operations
> >(416) 535-0123 x1307
>
> Scott Allan
> Director OpenSRS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
