I am wondering if someone could comment how this could have occurred if the
owner of the domain at opensrs did Not authorize the transfer??
swerve
> From: "Jo Shea - Danjo Creations" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 12:08:18 -0400
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Registrar Accountability (was Register.com snaps up Afternic.com)
>
> I have first hand knowledge of this happening.
>
> It's unclear who was to blame for the original administrative error that
> caused this name to be included (they all seem to be blaming each other).
> But regardless, NSI as gaining registrar did not confirm the transfer with
> my client who was properly registered with OpenSRS at the time. The name was
> transferred from INWW(MIT)- where it no longer resided? to NSI with Namezero
> back as the registrant. Before we transferred it to OpenSRS, the records at
> INWW properly showed my client as registrant after we paid Namezero to opt
> out of their service.
>
> Compliance is aware of the situation and we are awaiting a response as to
> whether it will be possible to get it back onto the OpenSRS system w/o
> incurring a renewal (& registry fee). Obviously, neither my client,
> ourselves, nor Tucows should have to pay for this to be corrected. Question
> is who will?
>
> Jo Shea
> Danjo Creations
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Christopher Stewart
>
> As well, I would like to ask Mr. Radar whether or not he has any information
> of domains being "hijacked" from OpenSRS.
>
> both
> domains were transferred (from OpenSRS) to the competing registrar WITHOUT
> permission from the actual Registrants.
>
> Once again, the statements above are second-hand, so I cannot confirm the
> information given to me. However, it is interesting to bring up into
> conversation the possibility of this occurring and the accountability
> registrars have or don't have in these situations.
>
> --Chris
>
>
>
