Hello Domain, Tuesday, October 17, 2000, 9:14:02 AM, you wrote: > The decision was that, covering yourself in a legalistic fashion > with fine print is not enough. You may not intentionally mislead people > through the US Mail. And if you listen carefully to yourself, and to the information the Postal Inspectors will give you, you will know that Mail Fraud only exists WITH SPECIFIC INTENT to fraud. Being aware of a problem in their billing and system, and not fixing it in a timely matter, is not the same as having a specific intent to fraud. You are not the first to float this idea that NSI is committing mail fraud, and you probably won't be the last. But the bottom line is that it is NOT mail fraud, at least not under the law. -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Patrick Greenwell
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Domain Registration Role Account
- Re: Network Sol Legal Pr... Patrick Greenwell
- Dot business Mark Lieb
- Re[2]: Network Sol Legal Probs William X. Walsh
- RE: Network Sol Legal Probs J. Scott Schiller
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Adam Beecher
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Charles Daminato
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Domain Registration Role Account
- Re: Re[2]: Network Sol Legal Probs William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: Network Sol Legal Pro... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re[4]: Network Sol Legal Pro... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[4]: Network Sol L... Rodney Payne
- Re[6]: Network Sol ... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Network Sol L... Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Network ... WebWiz
- Re: Re[4]: Netw... Chronos
- Re[6]: Network ... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: Netw... WebWiz
- RE: Re[6]: Netw... Rodney Payne
