Hello Rodney, Tuesday, October 17, 2000, 7:57:11 PM, you wrote: > as a judge once told me ignorance is not an excuse as far as the LAW is > concerned. Ignorance of whether an act is illegal is not an excuse. But the act in question has a mandatory element of intent. They have to be intending to fraud the recipient in order to be guilty. Two vastly different things. -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re[2]: Network Sol Legal Probs William X. Walsh
- RE: Network Sol Legal Probs J. Scott Schiller
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Adam Beecher
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Charles Daminato
- Re: Network Sol Legal Probs Domain Registration Role Account
- Re[2]: Network Sol Legal Probs William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: Network Sol Legal Pro... Domain Registration Role Account
- Re[4]: Network Sol Legal Pro... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[4]: Network Sol L... Rodney Payne
- Re: Re[4]: Network ... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Network Sol L... Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Network ... WebWiz
- Re: Re[4]: Netw... Chronos
- Re[6]: Network ... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: Netw... WebWiz
- RE: Re[6]: Netw... Rodney Payne
- Re[8]: Network ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[8]: Netw... Rodney Payne
- Re[10]: Network... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[10]: Net... Rodney Payne
