On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, WebWiz wrote:
> ACK is short for "ACKnowledge"...it's shorthand that was carried over from
> teletype communications...
>
> And this does sound a lot like the lockdown concept...it's a neat idea.
I support this as well for the list of wishes. The way eNom has this,
looks OK to me. You have to log into a webpage with user plus password
and uncheck a box to allow transfer to another registrar. (It is a bit
of a nuissance when you do want a transfer and did not remember this
and get a tranfer refused message. But that proved to me, that it does
work...)
--
Marc Schneiders
_________________________________________
http://DW.GOODFAITH.ORG: Have faith!
But let it be good, or you may be next...
_________________________________________
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Swerve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Derek J. Balling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Suggestion for "losing-registar ack'ing"
>
>
> Is this ACK (what is an ACK?)like the lockdown concept?
> swerve
>
> > From: "Derek J. Balling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:01:54 -0700
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Suggestion for "losing-registar ack'ing"
> >
> > OK, I read that OpenSRS is planning to implement "losing registrar
> acking".
> >
> > May I request that part of the record (Available via manage.opensrs.net,
> or
> > via the client code) be a checkbox saying
> >
> > /_/ Auto-NAK any request to transfer this domain to another registrar
> >
> > -or-
> >
> > /_/ Require explicit ACK before transferring this domain to another
> registrar
> >
> > If I'm on holiday for a week, I don't want a "default value" to have my
> > domain end up in China. ;-)
> >
> > D
> >
>
>
>
