I wouldn't say handle system is a good idea. Take example from Network Solutions. Many
users don't know what a handle is and create a new one everytime. The database end up
having tones of duplicated or similar unused handles. When the user somehow get to
manage their handle, they don't know which one they are using. It would just add more
confusion.
Talking about handles, it came to my mind that BulkRegister's handle system is even
weird. They have primary and secondary handles. Primary is the one you use to login,
but isn't the purpose of handle system is to avoid logging in? Secondary you can never
change the info in it. They tell you to make a new handle if you really want to
change. Those things just give me a lot of troubles.
Btw, BulkRegister claims to be the 2nd (or 3rd?) largest registrar, but they don't
even have many basic features. Like the handle system is a mess, and you can only
transfer domain from NSI, etc.
PS: I wonder what's the ranking of OpenSRS... anyone knows?
-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Effenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:12:45 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: suggestions
> Hi,
>
> I have got two suggestions for OpenSRS:
>
> 1. Please let the RSP delete his ordered domains. I do NOT mean
> deleting them after ordering them because they have been ordered
> wrong. I mean, if a customer doesn't want a domain anymore or if he
> 'is forced' to give it up, I want to fully delete it.
>
> 2. Please introduce a handle system.
>
> Any comments are welcome :-)
>
>
>
--
Get your free email from http://www.outblaze.net
Powered by Outblaze
