-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, adam wrote:
> Swerve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > With 6 billion humans on the planet,
> > an expanded namespace is necessary.
> >
> I'm all for expanding the namespace. I would prefer if it was opened up
> completely, and ICANN had some of their power distributed more evenly, Vint
> Cerf or no.
>
> However .tv has nothing to do with expanding the namespace. It's a ccTLD
> being marketed as a gTLD. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that per
> se, but what I am saying is that in my opinion it's worthless to most people.
> It's just marketing. It's vaporware.
.com .net .org, .vc, tv.
All the same.
It's a tld that resolvs.
> > The scope of the nameSpace
> > should reflect the scope of our mindSpace.
> >
> And that sounds like just the kind of crap dotTV marketroids would come out
> with...
>
> adam
>
> PS. Could people PLEASE stopping copying me off-list. I'm ON the list - I
> DON'T need to see it TWICE thank you!
>
- -----------------------------------
Dont worry Marge.
Trying is the first step to failure
-- Homer J. Simpson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Public key ID: 0xD467B527
iQEVAwUBOigPPlj6i6zUZ7UnAQHmogf/RLX76UGP5MHOcUjhKoDCzbV03CLgXbsR
PXA56/8cPRAgfu3uMOcljyWzGNL5Jue0H5RQYCxQTmOag0fnbG7hxvd03cxXCIFj
YBst56PKHNr8AgG+h01lW8esfzigwWXepzsu9sl5DxZQUXqZsdOd/UTryLBP0E+5
jbSDXkBgyNZVDRHoXkYUh3D/AS2ZRZuHPJYkjMeJEW5HYZkag/fAFfbNXgjfP+c+
yY2mCxibeOKxHGdXuAyzQGwmPG0e7ZjD4QGWT0uqe60RZ6qIXJ0eh+EtRFtYmUpu
LFlG98SI8/PUlpg/aYjottQ/Bzyoruebt81b/maK9buXcQn7yYxZpw==
=PyLB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
