You may get faster results by phoning Opensrs directly.
#'s in their contact section.
( funny description, Daffy.)
swerve
> From: "J. Scott Schiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:31:29 -0800
> To: "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: D^3, the Daffy Duck Dance for .CA
>
> Y'know how at the end of some Warner Bros. cartoons Daffy Duck would
> completely lose it and go pogo-ing into the sunset upside all the while
> screaming like a banshee....?
>
> Yeah.
>
> That's me.
>
> After my rant earlier today a bunch of the names that were
> listed as declined by the CIRA registry with the curious "registrant must
> be active" error response have now returned to saying "Processed", but are
> still listed under Orders In Progress.
>
> I must confess, along the way I registered a .CA name and this name's
> only reason for existence is to serve as a litmus test to experience
> what my customers are experience during the registration process.
>
> I let it time out and fail earlier last week thinking this process was
> blowing over.
>
> Tonight I got a note from CIRA saying I have to go through their
> bureaucracy-go-round
> in order to secure the name.
>
> Does this mean that the orders that were listed as failures with the cryptic
> error message
> had been allowed to time-out by their registrants and OpenSRS re-submitted
> them today?
>
> Should I be intervening and trying extra hard to motivate my customers to work
> through
> the CIRA Screens 'O Regitorture?
>
> Armed with this knowledge, I could probably register more names (hint, hint).
>
> Can someone from OpenSRS please clarify relatively soon please?
>
> I don't see any response to my earlier post on the list and received nothing
> in my personal mailbox.
>
>
> -s
>
> Scott Schiller
> VP
> GIA Web Services, Inc.
>
>
> Get your @ together!
> ---http://domainalchemy.com---
>
>
