At 3/23/01 5:21 PM, William X. Walsh wrote:

>"Tucows' domain name registration service, Domain Direct, will also be
>incorporated into the new browser, offering users the ability to easily
>register and manage domain names. Users can search for and register a domain
>name anytime by simply clicking on a link in the button bar. They will also
>be able to set up multiple e-mail accounts, forward domain names and manage
>their domains."

I see William's just going to post the facts and let others do the 
ranting. Sheesh. I guess I'll have to do it if nobody else will....

I realize that Tucows had Domain Direct running before starting OpenSRS, 
so there's probably little to be done about its existence. But if Tucows 
is making new deals, it bothers me greatly that Domain Direct would get 
an advantage over other resellers that comes directly from being a 
division of Tucows.

OpenSRS makes a big deal out of the fact that unlike other registrars 
(such as the one mentioned on this list last week), they don't compete 
with us. However, that's a convenient fiction that just doesn't hold 
water. Domain Direct *does* compete with us, and they are part of the 
same company as OpenSRS. Every domain sold through Domain Direct via a 
click of that Opera button is one less potential sale for an OpenSRS 
reseller.

The fact that Tucows is selling domains retail under a different name 
seems to have lulled people into believing there's no conflict: if Domain 
Direct was called "OpenSRS End User Domain Registration", I bet there 
would be a big brouhaha.

I know this stuff is subtle, and there are many arguments that can be 
made here. Someone will point out that I, too, could pay the Opera people 
and get a link in the Opera button bar. Of course, I probably couldn't 
afford to do so, and neither, I suspect, could Domain Direct if they 
didn't happen to be owned by a company that has something Opera wants. 
Maybe it's just my tough luck that I'm not owned by a portal company, and 
that's capitalism for you; I certainly can't fault Tucows for trying to 
make a buck.

But that's the whole point. Tucows is just trying to make a buck, and in 
this particular case they could have done it two ways. They could have 
made a deal to put a link on that button bar that took people to a list 
of OpenSRS resellers (or a random reseller), or they could just choose to 
link to Domain Direct instead.

Why they chose as they did is somewhat irrelevant. Sure, they make at 
least three times as much money per transaction with Domain Direct, but 
maybe they can justify the decision totally aside from any financial 
considerations at all. Still, there *are* financial ramifications of this 
decision, and these work out to the benefit of Domain Direct/Tucows and 
to the detriment of OpenSRS resellers. Some would say the end result is 
okay if the decision was well intentioned, but I don't like the fact that 
a conflict happened at all.

There's a myth that due to carefully constructed institutional firewalls, 
etc., THERE WILL BE NO POSSIBILITY OF CONFLICTS between OpenSRS resellers 
and Domain Direct, as if Domain Direct were in a blind trust.

As we can see, that's not true. THERE WILL BE CONFLICTS, even 
unintentional ones, where Tucows has an opportunity to decide whether to 
offer a lucrative advantage to Domain Direct or to all OpenSRS resellers. 
And if Tucows keeps Domain Direct running, there will be more. It doesn't 
matter what Tucows intends; the very nature of selling both wholesale and 
retail leads to conflicts. It's a long-standing business issue, and 
unfortunately many companies that try to maintain both retail and 
wholesale channels eventually lose the goodwill of their resellers, 
usually to the detriment of both parties.

The only way to surely avoid people thinking you're screwing them due to 
a conflict of interest is to avoid the very possibility of conflicts 
happening in the first place. As long as Tucows runs Domain Direct, 
that's impossible.

Maybe there's no way around it; it seems like every registrar competes 
with their resellers. So be it. But most of the others aren't doing what 
Tucows is doing: selling retail under one name (and spending 
money/resources promoting that channel) while selling wholesale under 
another name with the statement "we focus exclusively on the 
'business-to-business' market". It's, um, disingenuous.

At least we can all be honest about it: Tucows sells domain names, both 
retail and wholesale. Their retail channel competes with many of the 
resellers who buy from their wholesale channel, and sometimes they make 
choices that favor one over the other.

If that doesn't bother anyone, that's fine. Bothers me some, though.


--
Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies

[Standard disclaimer... I generally like OpenSRS and there's no need to 
tell me to go somewhere else if I disagree with some policies... we spend 
the most effort criticizing the ones we love... etc. In fact, while I've 
got the space, a tip o'the hat to OpenSRS for fixing some o' the 
outstanding bugs today.]

Reply via email to