Just to further add to this...I realize that the current profile system
is...um...a little tricky but it is a very big risk for us to implement
anything until we actually see how the registry operates. In a perfect
world, we would have been provided ALL of the information a long time
ago...however, this is the internet! As soon as we are provided with more
information from the registry (including the RTK) we can provide a much
better answer for you.
Your patience is appreciated...again :)
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Daminato
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Going to have trouble with PROFILES for info and biz
domains?
Ah, just got an update that also adds a different twist to this.
Since .biz and .info are both THICK registries (they are authoritative for
contact information), we have to create handles at their end - and we still
haven't hammered down all the difficulties in breaking and mixing and
altering profiles, and still have appropriate control over the right handles
(back end processing), etc...
In order to get OpenSRS to the point where you can control your own
handles... well, can you wait? Please?
I'll be getting deeper information tomorrow during a discussion on how we
can address this issue, and will get back to you then.
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
> Sent: June 13, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: Charles Daminato; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Going to have trouble with PROFILES for info and biz
> domains?
>
>
> > The reason for this is the new requirements for contact
> information (.info
> > phone numbers are specifically formatted, etc) and the additional
> > information we had to gather.
> >
>
> I understand what you mean but I think we are talking a bit along each
> other's side although we are talking about the same. The "load previous
> profile" option fulfills *two* tasks:
>
> 1. loading in of address data etc.
> This could be theoretically covered by your argument concerning the new
> requirements, but actually it isn't. You could have had it just
> configured to
> load only info domains which would have solved the formatting problem.
>
> 2. associating to a profile
>
> This has nothing to do with any new requirements.
> If I save a new domain with the same user/password but don't put a domain
> there it will *not* be available in the same profile (which I never
> understood, anyway, but, alas ...).
>
>
> > Once you get to realtime volumes and bulk implementation you
> should be able
> > to associate domains with previously registered (or pended)
> .biz or .info
> > domains.
> >
>
> Well, but this means that if we order some or several hundred
> domains before
> the "normal operation" registry we have to move *all* of them,
> one by one, to
> a new profile. Charles, can you imagine how long it will take us
> to do this?
>
> Please try to come up with a simpler method, f.i. the ability to
> automatically associate all domains of a reseller to one profile.
> Charles,
> please!
>
>
> Kai
>
> --
>
> Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
> IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
> ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
>
>
>
