On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, at 21:28 [=GMT-0400], Elliot Noss wrote:
> Most happy inside this cartel..........hmmm........there's something I never
> thought I would be accused of.
It was a bit harsh. Sorry, if I was impolite. Not that I do not
believe that ICANN is running a cartel under US Gov supervision.
> I guess I could say that I do think it is
> more appropriate than being before the US or any other national government
> in that circumstance.
I do not understand this sentence.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Regards
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc Schneiders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "elliot noss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Marc Schneiders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dennis Hisey"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:59 PM
> Subject: Re: ICANNwatch article on .INFO
>
>
> > Well worth noting that the US Government is *above* the board, and in
> > fact created the whole cartel. Then you feel most happy inside this
> > cartel, witness your contribution to the last (or was it the one
> > before, there are so many) ICANN meeting.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - -
> >
> http://www.ORG-domain-name-owners-lobby-against-ICANNs-sellout-to-VeriSign.O
> RG
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - -
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, at 18:05 [=GMT-0500], elliot noss wrote:
> >
> > > Well worth noting that there are more Europeans than Americans on the
> ICANN
> > > board (7 to 4 by my informal count). I proudly note there are also 2
> > > Canadians to share the blame.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Elliot Noss
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Marc Schneiders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Dennis Hisey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:34 PM
> > > Subject: Re: ICANNwatch article on .INFO
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, at 15:50 [=GMT-0400], Dennis Hisey wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Could someone please explain why there should even be a Sunrise
> period.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe ICANN can? They approved this lottery and name claiming
> > > > business. Or ask your Congress man. The US Government approved of the
> > > > whole thing as well. I am in Europe. I can do nothing against this
> > > > cartel that ICANN is.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Marc Schneiders --- Venster DNS Solutions
> > > > http://www.venster.nl/
> > > > http://www.bijt.net/
> > > >
> > > > > (Besides the obvious excuse to charge more money.) We have a UDRP
> that
> > > is
> > > > > supposed to deal with these types of problems. All it has done is
> give
> > > those
> > > > > with extra cash to spend, and a love of gambling, an advantage in
> > > > > registering names that would hardly be considered trademarks.
> > > > >
> > > > > At least the .biz process only warns you of potential trouble down
> the
> > > line,
> > > > > it doesn't stop you from trying to register. That seems somewhat
> fairer
> > > for
> > > > > everyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dennis Hisey
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.icannwatch.com/article.php?sid=249&mode=thread&order=0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have to disagree with Russ on one point, I think having the
> Sunrise
> > > > > > registration block the landrush is a good thing. Contrast with
> .BIZ
> > > > > > where IP claims don't even notify landrush hopefuls so people will
> > > > > > buy tickets with no hope of getting the domain and will have no
> > > > > > remedy when they get clobbered with an IP claim after they have
> > > > > > already been parted from their money.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My 0.02
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -mark
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > mark jeftovic
> > > > > > http://www.easydns.com
> > > > > > http://mark.jeftovic.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
