> For what I understand, there is a *big* difference between *managing* many
> domains on one profile and the contact and address data of domains.
>
Yes, Rick, there is ;-) And that is why I'm so surprised that you mix it.
With the current system I either have to retrieve a "profile" and register
all domains with exactly the same contact info (because I can't change it)
or I have to submit each single domain to its own single profile.
So, if I register a 100 domains for different clients I either have to
change contact (and registrant!) information "later" (in October) for a 100
domains or I have to "collect" a 100 domains from 100 different profiles
(which only differ by the domain name).
You are saying that a change would make it different to the current system
for com-net-org (cno) domains. I agree, that if you would implement it the
way I would *really* want it - that would be different. ;-) However,
currently I can save cno domains with *different* contact data to the *same*
profile, but I can't do that for biz and info. So, actually, it is different
*now* and allowing for changing the contact data would *level* that
difference.
> Features in the MWI
> like "Apply to All domains" will not make sense to have domains from
> different registries.
>
I agree that this could be tricky. And therefore I'm not asking for mixing
cno profiles and info/biz profiles. Nevertheless, it should be possible to
save biz/info domains with different contact data to the same respective
info/biz profile instead of only a new profile.
f.i. I should be able to save domain3.info with contacts A, B, C and
domain2.info with contacts D, E, F to the same profile
domain1.info/user/password (maybe with contact X, Y, Z;-).
Do you agree that the current implementation is cumbersome, to say the
least? ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
