Folks - some very important details regarding transfers coming off the ICANN
General Assembly mailing list (if you aren't a GA member, you're not cool ;)
Full ICANN run-down @
http://www.icann.org/montevideo/registration-transfer-topic.htm
Brief excerpt...
> "The allocation of responsibility does indicate,
> however, that the losing registrar may not deny a transfer request that
the
> gaining registrar has verified merely because the losing registrar has not
> verified it. Thus, a losing registrar should not deny a transfer request
> simply because it has notified the Registered Name Holder of the request
and
> has not received a response."
Full text of Danny Younger's post below...
Be sure to weigh in on the public comments forum @
http://forum.icann.org/regxfer/
Thanks,
-rwr
Tucows Inc.
t. 416.538.5492
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:15 PM
Subject: [ga] Letter from Louis Touton to Christine A. Russo (VeriSign)
> In a new announcement, "ICANN Montevideo Meeting Topic: Registration
Transfer
> Rules", our General Counsel, Louis Touton, offers his view on existing
> policies regarding transfers:
> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/touton-to-russo-27aug01.htm
>
> One notable excerpt: "The allocation of responsibility does indicate,
> however, that the losing registrar may not deny a transfer request that
the
> gaining registrar has verified merely because the losing registrar has not
> verified it. Thus, a losing registrar should not deny a transfer request
> simply because it has notified the Registered Name Holder of the request
and
> has not received a response."
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
> Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
