I agree with that. That would make this whole thing MUCH more palettable.
Cindy
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, George Kirikos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> --- Cameron Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At our efficacy rate, they rarely have to transfer more than once.
> > Picking
> > up Mr. Kiriko's comment, really disappointed customers are typically
> > given
> > refunds, though neither we nor most of our partners want to be in the
> > high-touch business of giving one-off refunds when most customers
> > really
> > wouldn't mind going for a second name. At our success rate, it's
> > outside
> > the realm of probability that we couldn't get a single name in the
> > year of
> > monitoring. And if we didn't, we'd refund the fee. Anyone doing due
>
> The terms of service should be updated, in that case, to put the
> ability to get a refund into writing. Some premium generic terms are
> dropping in the "SuperDrop" on Thursday, and I wouldn't want to get
> stuck with 15 SnapBacks on them should they not be successful.
> SnapNames' success ratio for the premium names hasn't been fantastic
> (neither has NameWinner's), i.e. for the 3-letter acronymns and
> one-worders. Ideally, like NameWinner, one should pay zero (or a small
> fee) up front, and then the balance only if the SnapBack is successful.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
>
--
"My theology, briefly, is that the universe was dictated but not
signed." (Christopher Morley)
