On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, at 10:15 [=GMT-0400], erol M wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, WebWiz wrote:
>
> > The speculators seem to think that if there's *ANY* interest
> > in the domain, it must be worth at least four figures.
Nonsense. Only selling a name for $100 takes more time than it is
worth. Usually people who get a name for small, keep emailing...
> Well the proof is in the wording, all they are doing is speculating. But I
> do not agree with the hefty price tags they put on these domains. Four
> digits, yeah right! Maybe if there were two digits ( preferably zeroes )
> after the decimal.
> If these *speculators* want to scoop up domains and charge a ridiculous
> fee for them, then I think the best thing to do is to ignore them and not
> pay their prices. Lest you play into their game.
I am a tiny little bit into the 'speculation' business. Never got more
than $1250,00 for a name, and that was a good one. I have no names of
the three or four word type (bestbuyintown.com say). More like
kizz.com, marketizer.com. civilwatch.com. I do not do any marketing,
so that may be why I do not get rich. I 'snatch' expired names (it is
still possible, really), that I may want to use for our own business,
and sell some that do not materialize.
> Out of curiousity, whats your take on people who spend thousands on
> "mis-spelled" domains? Ive spoken with people who believe there is HUGE
> money in this and Ive never really heard anyone on the lists speak about
> this ( unless the general attitude is that there is nothing to discuss
> here ).
I did a test about this. See http://jptmail.com.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ad: [ignore] http://abeyance.org/index2.html
