On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, dnsadmin wrote: > Is the following text STILL necessary, or is it dated, useless, and a waste > of everyone's time to read?
Yes. Because the registration rules still reflect this. The board would need to approve a new set of rules that would no longer make this needed. Mmmm.. Lawyers. (And yes it is being looked into -- but rule changes are currently complicated) p. > > It's found on one of the final CIRA "I AGREE" screens: > > "Any Registration of a new domain name effected prior to December 1, 2000 on > the basis of a request made to CIRA by a Registrar on or after November 8, > 2000 will be made in the registry currently operated by the University of > British Columbia (UBC Registry). If the Registration is a re-registration of > a domain name that was already in the UBC Registry, it will be maintained > there until December 1, 2000. In either case, when CIRA takes over operation > of the .ca registry on December 1, 2000, the registration will automatically > be registered in the CIRA Registry and activated without any further action > by you. The date of your CIRA registration will be December 1, 2000" > > ..I personally see none of the foregoing as necessary and people should be > slapping CIRA and begging them to wake up. > --- Paul Andersen (InterNIC:PA137) [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Gate Communications Inc. T: +1 (416) 447-7700x23 "The Trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was." - NANOG
