Perhaps you didn't have any affected domains, then. I had four affected by it, and can tell you that OpenSRS's notification and explanation was quite detailed.
There's been some discussion on the list regarding the year that was removed and whether or not it was paid for. It is my strong belief that the year WAS PAID FOR by the registrant, despite the fact that it may have been refunded to the registrar (Network Solutions). Since I only have a handful of domains affected, I have opted to pay for a one year renewal if my customers wish to keep the name. OpenSRS has handled it very well, and the options available to customers are as good as they can be, given the actions already taken by the registry. I have no complaint with how OpenSRS has handled it. Regards, Eric Longman Atl-Connect Internet Services +-------------------------------------------------------+ | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net | | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 | | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-------------------------------------------------------+ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Landau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:36 AM Subject: OpenSRS "fix" to the Verisign "bug" fix (Re: Problem with showing expired domains in reseller interface >these domains are part of the verisign bug fix that was recently >implemented. >I will forward the email we sent out off list. the secrecy around the OpenSRS "fix" to the verisign "bug" fix is very strange. even more so after it is becoming clear that OpenSRS was not able to deliver on it's promise that everything would be resolved in a good way. kind regards philippe, http://InternetRoot.com
