Wednesday, Wednesday, December 19, 2001, 4:03:09 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> At 12/19/01 1:29 PM, William X Walsh wrote: >>I stand by my statement then and now, first come first served, no >>sunrise or landrush preregistration periods, is the only fair method >>of doing it. > But that's the same thing as "he with the most money wins", because the > way you would guarantee a good chance is by signing up with many > registrars, or with companies working somewhat like SnapNames that > promised you many connection attempts. And each of them would charge you > a whole bunch of money. Heck, even OpenSRS offered premium submissions > for .info, guaranteeing that for some extra money you'd get more cracks > at being "first come" and therefore improve your chances of being "first > served". > First come, first served sounds good in theory, but is not fair in I've yet to see a proposed solution that is any more fair than FCFS. Is it perfect? No. But it is certainly the MOST fair manner. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Webcertificates.info SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea
