Chuck Hatcher and list, ;) My take is owner and registrant. The definition of "registrant" is a beaten down topic I'm sure. Allow me to drift on this topic just a bit.
A guy buys a section of land, builds on it etc... In his lifetime he can loose it for many reasons (just like a domain) having nothing to do with not having already totally paid for the property. Examples are not paying property taxes, he dies with no heir, government takes it because they want to build a road, the list goes on. If this guy owns the property but can be taken at almost any time, under what circumstances was his land really safe? And if he did default on a loan, would the bank let him come back after payment deadline and pay the balance without penalty? Let alone let him have another chance at payment? Right now we have a client that tells us his father has a mild case of Alzheimer's. The bank wants his land to build on. If they can convince him to leave his property they can have him committed and take ownership of his land and holdings. There seems to be no real line between being a caretaker and owner. You can pay money ...a large sum of money but are you really ever in a position of control? I don't claim to know the answers here. I'm just applying some odd ball logic. Happy whatever, :) Lars Hindsley SpyProductions
