AFAIK it has been updated to the latest (2.46), I'll find out for sure. Charles Daminato OpenSRS Product Manager Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bryan Waters > Sent: December 27, 2001 12:24 PM > To: Scott Allan; myOstrich Internet > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-sf or OpenSRS software? > > > Is it current with the latest 2.45 release mods? > > -bryanw > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Allan > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:55 AM > To: myOstrich Internet > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OpenSRS-sf or OpenSRS software? > > > The SF release is the best PERL implementation to use IMHO - it will > become the standard distro early in the new year, and is what new users > should pick up if they are planning on using PERL. > > Scott Allan > Director, OpenSRS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, myOstrich Internet wrote: > > > When I was signing up as a reseller, I thought I read somewhere that the > > OpenSRS-sf project at SourceForge was going to become the standard > > release for OpenSRS software. > > > > I cannot find that reference any longer. > > > > Did I imagine this? > > > > What are the advantages and disadvantages of going with either approach > > to a code base? > > > > I'm almost ready to go live with the OpenSRS-sf software (completing the > > integration to 2CheckOut.com right now), but I'm interested in opinions > > on what's the best strategic approach here. > > > > Other alternatives that make sense? I almost grabbed the PHP libraries > > and started from scratch as I'm much more comfortable with PHP than I am > > with Perl, but it also appeared that the OpenSRS-sf project was fairly > > well along - though still lacking some significant features. > > > > Comments? Suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -t > > > >
