Friday, Friday, January 04, 2002, 4:38:54 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote: > At 1/4/02 3:36 PM, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>>Not if the registrars have anything to do with it. The proposal is neither >>comprehensive enough, nor focused enough for anyone to endorse it at this >>point. >> >>More info here: >>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg01727.html > Preach on, Brother Ross. That's what I was trying to say (only yours is > more coherent). > In addition to my general agreement with the whole thing, I specifically > support the idea that an auction-type model is what's needed to actually > balance supply and demand. The introduction of a second price point at Why should a domain that has previously been registered and then expired be treated as worth any more value than one that has not? I say it is not the fact that the domain is being expired and deleted that gives it value, but the string itself. If the string is desirable, it has value, but that is not a judgement call the Registry or Registrars should be making. Domains should stick to FCFS, and anything the registries or registrars do to try and work around that should be thwarted. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --
