Thursday, Thursday, January 17, 2002, 12:14:56 PM, Chuck Hatcher wrote: > Not to excuse the fact that this should have been anticipated and dealt with by >Neulevel before now, they DO have a point.
> I have been unable to get the auth_code/auth info code/auth info token/secret >decoder ring for .info domain names I have registered at Enom, NameScout, and >Bulkregister. > It used to bother me a lot, until I discovered that even with the code >(RegistrationTek provides codes on request), my attempted .info transfers time out >(Afilias whois says transfer pending, but > the OpenSRS order times out after about a week.) What really stinks about this is that they are using a piss poor justification for the entire process. Nuelevel could EASILY establish a system for secure transfer authentication, since, unlike the com/net/org registry, they have the email information for the admin contact in their own database, and could create their own email authorization system for transfers. Yet they use Verisign's fictional "rampant domain slamming" argument to extend the no transfer period. I sometimes wonder how much common sense some of these companies have. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer interprets the truth." -- Jean Giradoux
