On the flip side of the coin, I am sure that potential re sellers of OpenSRS watch this list before joining. And the Open discussion demonstrates to them that OpenSRS is the place to be for support of resellers, both from OpenSRS and peer based.
To develop a list that is re seller only based would only close out the novices. If I were NSI, or any other registrar I would already be an OpenSRS re seller under an assumed name to have access to the OpenSRS resources. I dont know about other re sellers but I regularly check out what other domain name channels are doing to make sure that what my re seller and the resellers I support are offering features and services on par with the features of any re seller of Enom, NSI, etc. For sensitive issues that dont belong on this list .. well that is what NDA's are for. just my thoughts on this issue. michael tldsystems inc. At 04:08 PM 1/23/2002 -0500, Spy OpenSRS Mail wrote: >This is the part where DJ Chuck D tells us there is already a list for that, >and they we should not be opening our trap on this list about RSP business. ><grin> > >Lars > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tim Hewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: January 23, 2002 3:57 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: OpenSRS should not be so Open > > >I know it's an unpopular position as well, but I agree with Lars, we >should have a place where we can talk as Resellers, without exposing the >discussion to the general public. I think there should be a general >public list as well - don't get me wrong - however I suspect a closed >list would be of great value as well. > >-Tim
