Agreed.  But if there is sufficient demand, what's to stop us from starting 
our own list?

I too have often thought it would be beneficial, and dozens if not hundreds 
of us control our own mailservers.  The only hurdle I can see would be 
validation of reseller status... though this could be accomplished by 
requiring a screenshot of the live-reseller system showing transactions and 
the email address for subscription to the list.  Of course, if NSI (or 
anyone) wanted in badly enough, an employee could sign up as a reseller. :-)

-Russ




At 04:23 PM 1/23/2002, Michael Brody wrote:
>On the flip side of the coin,
>
>I am sure that potential re sellers of OpenSRS watch this list before 
>joining.   And the Open discussion demonstrates to them that OpenSRS is 
>the place to be for support of resellers, both from OpenSRS and peer based.
>
>To develop a list that is re seller only based would only close out the 
>novices.  If I were NSI,  or any other registrar I would already be an 
>OpenSRS re seller under an assumed name to have access to the OpenSRS 
>resources.    I dont know about other re sellers but I regularly check out 
>what other domain name channels are doing to make sure that what my re 
>seller and the resellers I support are offering  features and services on 
>par with the features of any re seller of Enom, NSI,  etc.
>
>For sensitive issues that dont  belong on this list  .. well that is what 
>NDA's are for.
>
>
>just my thoughts on this issue.
>
>michael
>tldsystems inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>At 04:08 PM 1/23/2002 -0500, Spy OpenSRS Mail wrote:
>>This is the part where DJ Chuck D tells us there is already a list for that,
>>and they we should not be opening our trap on this list about RSP business.
>><grin>
>>
>>Lars
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tim Hewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: January 23, 2002 3:57 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: RE: OpenSRS should not be so Open
>>
>>
>>I know it's an unpopular position as well, but I agree with Lars, we
>>should have a place where we can talk as Resellers, without exposing the
>>discussion to the general public. I think there should be a general
>>public list as well - don't get me wrong - however I suspect a closed
>>list would be of great value as well.
>>
>>-Tim
>
>

Reply via email to