At 2/6/02 3:09 PM, Charles Daminato wrote:
Oh, and there was a miscommunication on one piece (.ca transfers not sending CC info to message.txt); I was informed that it was not completed, but it actually went out... Is this means that .ca transfers is sending CC info to message.txt or not. Please clarify. Thanks All the .name stuff was not part of the maintenance release, and unfortunately did not make that doc, so it's somewhat misleading. A .name suppliment should be released shortly. Charles Daminato OpenSRS Product Manager Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert L Mathews > Sent: February 6, 2002 1:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Upgrading > > > At 2/6/02 9:48 AM, Charles Daminato wrote: > > >You only need to upgrade if there is some functionality you > require that has > >been added, or if there is a bug affecting you that has been fixed. Each > >version that's released has an "Upgrade Guide" that shows the > changes to the > >client/server at that time. > > The upgrade guide could use a little more, ummm, detail to make it useful > for this purpose. > > For example, the sole comment in the 2.49 upgrade guide about client > changes is "Nothing significant to report, sir!". However, the diff file > from 2.48 reveals major items like: > > >+ Introduced initial .name manageability into MWI. > >+ - ability to manage .name domain nameservers and > >+ forwarding email address (if it was purchased) > > ... and a number of extremely useful bug fixes. These should be mentioned > in the upgrade guide if it's intended to be used by technical people (or, > if pressed for time, a simple note informing people that a number of > changes have been made, and instructing them to see the diff file, would > be helpful). > > -- > Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies > > "The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody > appreciates how difficult it was." >
