i was half kidding... :-)
> From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:05:12 -0500 > To: "Swerve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Donny Simonton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: New Verisign tactic with whois? > > Nope, ICANN is a not-for-profit organization afaik > > Charles Daminato > OpenSRS Product Manager > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Swerve >> Sent: April 4, 2002 2:02 PM >> To: Donny Simonton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: New Verisign tactic with whois? >> >> >> Doesn't Verisign own Icann? >> >> :-) >> >>> From: "Donny Simonton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:15:04 -0600 >>> To: "'Judith Schreger - eWave'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: RE: New Verisign tactic with whois? >>> >>> Based on the Registrar Accreditation Agreement that all registrars sign >>> with ICANN which is located at >>> http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm. >>> >>> Requires all Registrations to provide WHOIS information and one of the >>> includes: >>> 3.3.1.5 The expiration date of the registration; >>> >>> So Verisign is breaking their Agreement with ICANN. >>> >>> Donny >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-discuss- >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Judith Schreger - eWave >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:48 AM >>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Subject: AW: New Verisign tactic with whois? >>>> >>>> hi there, >>>> >>>> >>>> happened to me too (with three or four domains last and this week). >>>> i don't think it's about making it harder to get away, but to make it >>>> impossible to guess if a domain is still paid for or expired, and if >>> it is >>>> expired when it will be released by them. >>>> >>>> kind regards, >>>> >>>> judith >>>> >>>> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Ivan >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. April 2002 09:49 >>>> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Betreff: New Verisign tactic with whois? >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi List. >>>> >>>> Ok, I gained a new client last week and when I looked up his domains, >>> they >>>> had expired. So, I explained we would have to renew them with netsol >>> (the >>>> current registrar). So i did as said (for 1 year of course). NOW, >>> after >>>> the >>>> whois update, I am seeing that the expired date is no longer even >>> being >>>> shown.... for both domains. >>>> >>>> Am I getting paranoid in thinking that as they update whois data for >>>> domains, they are stripping away the expires date to make it even >>> harder >>>> to >>>> get away from them at the right time???? >>>> >>>> Any one else seen this on newly changed data at net sol?? >>>> >>>> The domain is PYRINEX.COM should anyone want to view this. >>>> >>>> _ivan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>
