|
Hi Mike,
Yeah, that was what I just asked Chuck
if he knew about.
I noticed the same thing when I looked at
the headers.
I've never heard of them, but it sure is making a
bunch of hops through them!
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:38
PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm... ??
Here are details Mark... Looks like their is
someone else involved ;) Who is "eticomm.net"
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received:
from www.opensrs.org (www.opensrs.org [216.40.33.61])
by
ns1.4cheapdomains.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
g4MF7BK6001803
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 22 May 2002 08:07:12 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by www.opensrs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
QAA10636
for discuss-list-outgoing; Wed, 22 May 2002 16:37:59
-0400
Received: from relay.eticomm.net (mail.eticomm.net
[204.213.252.17])
by www.opensrs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
QAA10629
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,
22 May 2002 16:37:57 -0400
Received: from root by relay.eticomm.net with
local (Exim 3.33 #2)
id 17Acrq-000M66-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 22
May 2002 16:37:54 -0400
Received: from [216.40.33.61]
(helo=www.opensrs.org)
by relay.eticomm.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33
#2)
id 17A1EX-000OTq-00; Tue, 21 May 2002 00:26:49 -0400
Received:
(from majordomo@localhost)
by www.opensrs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
XAA23816
for discuss-list-outgoing; Mon, 20 May 2002 23:51:32
-0400
Received: from mail (planet-nic.com [63.249.22.73] (may be
forged))
by www.opensrs.org
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA23811
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,
20 May 2002 23:51:30 -0400
Received: from tech01 (63.249.22.73) by
MAIL (MailMax 4. 8. 2. 4) with ESMTP id 30501640 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20
May 2002 20:50:51 -0700 PDT
Message-ID: <03df01c2007a$ed9d8a10$6401000a@tech01">03df01c2007a$ed9d8a10$6401000a@tech01>
From:
"Mark Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<005701c20029$ceb32020$effce9d0@mikie">005701c20029$ceb32020$effce9d0@mikie>
<038d01c20036$2dddcda0$6401000a@tech01">038d01c20036$2dddcda0$6401000a@tech01>
<003801c20040$18bad6c0$19fde9d0@mikie">003801c20040$18bad6c0$19fde9d0@mikie>
Subject:
Re: Hmmm... ??
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 20:52:28 -0700
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03DC_01C20040.40E48420"
X-Priority:
3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V5.00.2919.6700
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence:
bulk
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:16
PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm... ??
What The...!?!?!
Chuck, can you tell what's
going on here? Any idea why this message keeps coming through?
I've scanned all our servers and workstations,
and we don't appear to have any virii lurking around.
This is starting to
worry me a bit now.
Thanks,
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:52
PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm... ??
I don't. Actually, I was kind of hoping you
would have. ;o)
Oh well...
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 1:51
PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm... ??
Nope. Hadn't heard of them. Do you know of
anyone using them? That's more what we are looking for. Honest opinions
from honest people ;)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:40
PM
Subject: Re: Hmmm... ??
I know this is shifting the topic a bit,
but, Have you checked out ECHO yet? http://echo-inc.com
Seems like a pretty cool way of doing it.
They have pre built open source objects
to write your scripts around,
and they are their own gateway, etc., so
none of this *10 bills from 10 different companies* thing like if
you're
using one of the Authorize.Net incarnations. Plus, they're
only $20 / month total.
Just curious
if you'd heard anything about them. We're looking into switching over
to them.
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002
11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Hmmm... ??
Just seems that they have no intensions
in playing by the rules at all. (Period) ;) I have a strange feeling
it is in some way owned by the v-idiots.. When I get time I am going
to dig some more ;) I was considering them for credit card
processing as I am thinking of switching and I have a feeling I
should stay away from them. We have been ripped off by one card
company in the past and are not sure who to trust anymore... Our
current processor doesn't have all the perks..
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002
12:28 PM
Subject: RE: Hmmm... ??
Well, sounds like they don't have full contact information
(although I wouldn't be surprised if the email or phone number
worked though. If you have a dispute with this, you
should contact the registrar (since there's a STATUS at the
bottom, I'll assume it's not an OpenSRS name)
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product
Manager
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mystery....
|
