Can we get a word from OSRS on 
what third parties purchased this bulk access?
--- Michael Brunson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's play a little game with Occam's Razor...
> 
> Perhaps they took the lazy and lawful route of buying
> the WHOIS data?
> 
> Why would openSRS (or any registrar) do this? Another
> simple answer, they must.
> 
> Here are some relevant quotes, which some of you have
> probably seen many times:
> 
> ---------------
> REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT
> http://www.icann.org/nsi/icann-raa-04nov99.htm
> [...]
> 
> F. Public Access to Data on SLD Registrations. During 
>    the term of this Agreement:
> [...]
> 
> 6. In addition, Registrar shall provide third-party 
>    bulk access to the data subject to public access 
>    under Section II.F.1 under the following terms and 
>    conditions:
> 
>  a. Registrar shall make a complete electronic copy of 
>     the data available at least one time per week for 
>     download by third parties who have entered into a 
>     bulk access agreement with Registrar.
> 
>  b. Registrar may charge an annual fee, not to exceed 
>     US$10,000, for such bulk access to the data.
> 
>  c. Registrar's access agreement shall require the 
>     third party to agree not to use the data to allow, 
>     enable, or otherwise support the transmission of 
>     mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or 
>     solicitations via e-mail (spam).
> 
>  d. Registrar's access agreement may require the third 
>     party to agree not to use the data to enable 
>     high-volume, automated, electronic processes that
>     apply to Registrar (or its systems).
> 
>  e. Registrar's access agreement may require the third 
>     party to agree not to sell or redistribute the data
>     except insofar as it has been incorporated by the 
>     third party into a value-added product or service 
>     that does not permit the extraction of a 
>     substantial portion of the bulk data from the 
>     value-added product or service for use by other 
>     parties.
> 
>  f. Registrar may enable SLD holders who are
>     individuals to elect not to have Personal Data 
>     concerning their registrations available for bulk 
>     access for marketing purposes based on Registrar's 
>     "Opt-Out" policy, and if Registrar has such a 
>     policy Registrar shall require the third party to 
>     abide by the terms of that Opt-Out policy; 
>     provided, however, that Registrar may not use such 
>     data subject to opt-out for marketing purposes in 
>     its own value-added product or service.
> ---------------
> 
> I think that pretty much speaks for itself. if not.. 
> Registrars must allow for companies to buy their WHOIS
> data. I don't like it anymore than anyone else we I get
> the letters and I dislike it even more when it takes
> customers, but since those are the current rules we
> shall live by them. If you want to change the rules,
> that is a different topic and a different list.
> 
> 
> Have a great night,
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:41:57 -0700, Genie Livingstone
> used a few recycled electrons to form:
> 
> | It's being done all the time - they spread the lookups over several
> | unsuspecting whois script owners and time them about one whois
> querry
> | per so many seconds - we catch them all the time on our whois.cgi
> and
> | simply block that IP simply to find another rascal trying later,
> this is
> | one of the reasons we think livestats or similar visitor monitoring
> are
> | priceless to protect our IP from being banned since there are abuse
> | attempts by harvesters
> | 
> | cheers
> | Genie
> | 
> | 
> | > How about the following scenario:
> | > 1. someone signed up for zone files (free)
> | > 2. someone2 wrote a perl script for someone for $50 (25/hr)
> | > that perl script does the following:
> | > opens zone file stored localy.
> | > queries using oroginal registrar whois server.
> | > looks if expiration date is in the next century or less,
> | > if this the case puts all necesarry information into template.
> | > when all zone file are done prints results.
> | > Then manyaly someone3 puts it into envelops an mails it (bulk)
> | > 3. someone gets payments from the customers of other registrars.
> | > 4. Since ICANN takes no action and this "additional" incomes
> saves the
> | > company from Ch 11. this info is priceless.
> | 
> | 
> | 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

Reply via email to