Where is Verisign's name Hrm...;>

--
Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
(812) 275-8425 - Office
(815) 364-1278 - Fax
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Oleg Chebotarev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Michael Brunson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: Register.Com sending letters now???!!!


> > Can we get a word from OSRS on
> > what third parties purchased this bulk access?
>
> Certainly...
>
> Thomson & Thomson
> Hostway
> Valueweb
> Accurl
> eMarkmonitor
> Netnames
> Snapnames
> Dun & Bradstreet
>
> This list is accurate as of this past Sunday. Also, attached is a sample
of
> our current agreement.
>
> -rwr
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Oleg Chebotarev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Michael Brunson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Register.Com sending letters now???!!!
>
>
> > Can we get a word from OSRS on
> > what third parties purchased this bulk access?
> > --- Michael Brunson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Let's play a little game with Occam's Razor...
> > >
> > > Perhaps they took the lazy and lawful route of buying
> > > the WHOIS data?
> > >
> > > Why would openSRS (or any registrar) do this? Another
> > > simple answer, they must.
> > >
> > > Here are some relevant quotes, which some of you have
> > > probably seen many times:
> > >
> > > ---------------
> > > REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT
> > > http://www.icann.org/nsi/icann-raa-04nov99.htm
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > F. Public Access to Data on SLD Registrations. During
> > >    the term of this Agreement:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > 6. In addition, Registrar shall provide third-party
> > >    bulk access to the data subject to public access
> > >    under Section II.F.1 under the following terms and
> > >    conditions:
> > >
> > >  a. Registrar shall make a complete electronic copy of
> > >     the data available at least one time per week for
> > >     download by third parties who have entered into a
> > >     bulk access agreement with Registrar.
> > >
> > >  b. Registrar may charge an annual fee, not to exceed
> > >     US$10,000, for such bulk access to the data.
> > >
> > >  c. Registrar's access agreement shall require the
> > >     third party to agree not to use the data to allow,
> > >     enable, or otherwise support the transmission of
> > >     mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or
> > >     solicitations via e-mail (spam).
> > >
> > >  d. Registrar's access agreement may require the third
> > >     party to agree not to use the data to enable
> > >     high-volume, automated, electronic processes that
> > >     apply to Registrar (or its systems).
> > >
> > >  e. Registrar's access agreement may require the third
> > >     party to agree not to sell or redistribute the data
> > >     except insofar as it has been incorporated by the
> > >     third party into a value-added product or service
> > >     that does not permit the extraction of a
> > >     substantial portion of the bulk data from the
> > >     value-added product or service for use by other
> > >     parties.
> > >
> > >  f. Registrar may enable SLD holders who are
> > >     individuals to elect not to have Personal Data
> > >     concerning their registrations available for bulk
> > >     access for marketing purposes based on Registrar's
> > >     "Opt-Out" policy, and if Registrar has such a
> > >     policy Registrar shall require the third party to
> > >     abide by the terms of that Opt-Out policy;
> > >     provided, however, that Registrar may not use such
> > >     data subject to opt-out for marketing purposes in
> > >     its own value-added product or service.
> > > ---------------
> > >
> > > I think that pretty much speaks for itself. if not..
> > > Registrars must allow for companies to buy their WHOIS
> > > data. I don't like it anymore than anyone else we I get
> > > the letters and I dislike it even more when it takes
> > > customers, but since those are the current rules we
> > > shall live by them. If you want to change the rules,
> > > that is a different topic and a different list.
> > >
> > >
> > > Have a great night,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:41:57 -0700, Genie Livingstone
> > > used a few recycled electrons to form:
> > >
> > > | It's being done all the time - they spread the lookups over several
> > > | unsuspecting whois script owners and time them about one whois
> > > querry
> > > | per so many seconds - we catch them all the time on our whois.cgi
> > > and
> > > | simply block that IP simply to find another rascal trying later,
> > > this is
> > > | one of the reasons we think livestats or similar visitor monitoring
> > > are
> > > | priceless to protect our IP from being banned since there are abuse
> > > | attempts by harvesters
> > > |
> > > | cheers
> > > | Genie
> > > |
> > > |
> > > | > How about the following scenario:
> > > | > 1. someone signed up for zone files (free)
> > > | > 2. someone2 wrote a perl script for someone for $50 (25/hr)
> > > | > that perl script does the following:
> > > | > opens zone file stored localy.
> > > | > queries using oroginal registrar whois server.
> > > | > looks if expiration date is in the next century or less,
> > > | > if this the case puts all necesarry information into template.
> > > | > when all zone file are done prints results.
> > > | > Then manyaly someone3 puts it into envelops an mails it (bulk)
> > > | > 3. someone gets payments from the customers of other registrars.
> > > | > 4. Since ICANN takes no action and this "additional" incomes
> > > saves the
> > > | > company from Ch 11. this info is priceless.
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to