Please be real, that is not the case at all. No one would be ripped off.
More of a partial payment to get things even. Everyone has their views, and
I know one of our largest clients would much rather spend all the money at
once and have it over and have all the expiration dates at one date, not 500
like current. From a domain coordinator point of view this would make
their lives much easier. I am talking about customers with 400+ domains.
And with all the bad publicity with Verisign deleting domains etc or
changing renewal dates, this would be added security to the registrant
knowing the EXACT DAY and year their domains would be dropped. Much easier
to watch for any funny stuff etc....
--
Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
(812) 275-8425 - Office
(815) 364-1278 - Fax
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "myOstrich Internet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Moving renewal dates...
> > What motivation would the registries have to support partial period
> > domain registrations? I know if I were running the CNO registry, I
> > wouldn't even consider this - as there is nothing in it for me as the
> > registry. There are plenty of other things I would spend my money on...
>
> It lets the registry rip off the customer. Customer pays for a full year,
> and only receives "x" months of service instead.
>
> It depends on implementation, but again, I don't really think it's worth
> while.
>
>
> --
> The nice thing about standards, there is enough for everyone to have their
own.
>
>
