The PAF doesn't seem to be online for obvious reasons, but this isn't what the original problem needed AFAIK.
Presumably you just want the correct format for validating a correct code, which I don't see on the Consignia site. Andy. > But how does this help us? Where do we find extensions or > solutions to the problem at hand from that site? > > Charles Daminato > TUCOWS Product Manager > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Xeotech wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Ivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:32 PM > > Subject: Re: .uk reg problem > > > > CD wrote: > > > > > Interesting this came up, we're fixing the postal code parser (not > > > yet promoted). > > > > Very commendable, though one wonders why you are possibly > > re-inventing the wheel? ;-) > > > > > Anyway, look for proper .uk postal code formats here: > > > http://www.magma.ca/~djcl/postcd.txt > > > > Since the UK PAF ( Pstal Address File ) is a fluid beast, > and constantly > > being updated, the above list is not really authoritative. > The current identity > > of the company originally responsible for the UK PAF can be > found here: > > > > http://www.consignia-online.com/ > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Chris. > > > > Xeotech > > > > 8 Yew Tree Rise . Croughton . Brackley . Northants. NN13 > 5UW . United Kingdom > > tel: +44(0)1869 810143 . voice/fax +44(0)7092 199733 . > mbl:+44(0)7957 724648 > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . web: http://xeotech.co.uk > > > > > > > >
