This attempt to create a separate "add-on" TLD/root space that only a very small percentage of internet users can even access (and only if they or their ISP did something special to access it) by an unofficial private group has been discussed many times on this list. Here is a sample of some of the reasons why this is a bad idea, as previously stated on this list (from the list archives):

From: Duane Cook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0103/0119.html

From: Craig Bernstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0103/0104.html

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0108/0148.html

From: Robert L Mathews ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0108/0151.html

There are many more....

Doug

At 10:09 PM 1/31/03, you wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, at 21:45 [=GMT-0500], Doug Braun at Emerge2 wrote:
> At 06:36 PM 1/31/03, you wrote:

> >Looks like BulkRegister just got into the alternative domain business with
> >new.net.  Will tucows soon be offering domains in inclusive namespace?
>
> I sure hope not.

Since this is the second dismissal I see here, I think I may ask:

Why not?



Reply via email to